Comparison of bioethical views in the work of Peter Singer and in ethics of social consequences

The present paper compares the ethics of Peter Singer and social consequences in bioethics. As part discussion on consequences, attention is mainly focused theory its founder, Vasil Gluchman, works his selected students. First, bioethical views are analyzed, preference utilitarianism presented through prism understanding person. In this sense, Singer’s view issues abortion infanticide presented. Furthermore, study deals with killing animals people regarding criticism speciesism prioritization criterion. Attention also paid to euthanasia. presents representatives namely non-utilitarian consequentialism. It focuses question what extent genetics, according determines morality whether protection life an absolute value for consequences. analyzes issue from point Selected attitudes proponents compare two concepts determine ontological fundaments which relies. discusses concept person, claiming that argues human dignity positive humans. does not work dignity. paper, considered a hybrid ethical theory, unlike Preference accept euthanasia particular cases. accepts them only if contradicts dignity, preferential it aligns person’s preferences or Gluchman admits solutions above as altruistic help suffering However, consider animal nor condone infanticide, utilitarianism.